A few things about Roseanne. First of all, Valerie Jarrett is white. Are we going to redefine the entire chromatic spectrum because of a silly issue of ethnic pigeonholing? The woman is white -- end of story.
Ironically, when the "Planet of the Apes" production broke for lunch, actors segregated by species. This was unplanned; no one was taught how to mingle in a multi-species context. This was a natural expression of an innate tendency. It's the same in nature. There's no pride of lions that includes a moose, a baboon, and a Tasmanian shrew.
Lose the sensitivity about associating blacks with apes. "Science" informs us that we are all equally close to apes -- or equally distant. Get over it.
Joe Rogan spoke to his friend Roseanne after the ill-fated tweet destined to resound through the ages among the vilest crimes of human infamy. Genghis, Stalin, Roseanne. For shame. Joe believes her that stress in combination with meds produced a cranky, groggy state in which she made comments she later regretted. I guess nobody else has ever done this.
I also think the larger context is being omitted from the mainstream narrative. This began as Roseanne's critique of Ms Jarrett's possible involvement in illegal activities of the Obama administration. The omission of this behavioral factor to the virtually exclusive focus on race strikes me as, well, racist -- so typical of those who purport to oppose racism.
Political correctness is responsible for much of the Left's recent electoral defeats, including the White House, Congress, and many state governments. This is a great opportunity for the Left to show it's learned from history and is willing to deal with reality on its own terms. Roseanne has always been a controversial figure. She is not the devil. Accept her apology, and move on.
Here are around 30 typical characteristics of mass school shootings.
How many of these do you think will apply here?
Let’s check and see. Will report back.
Improper police procedure, especially stand down or other factors preventing immediate intervention.
Improper EMS procedures followed — especially pronouncement of death.
Emergency personnel appearing lackadaisical, untroubled, or unduly relaxed.
Bodies left lying around.
CCTV not recording in area of shooting but recording in other areas.
Connection to or involvement of federal alphabet agencies.
Expert marksmanship required to kill that many people in that little time.
Photos or videos of shooter that lack key identifying information.
Photos or videos that are excessively blurry or that omit beginning or ending that contains key information.
Mutually contradictory witness reports, video footage, and photographs.
No evidence of bullet holes in wall.
Implausible injuries and unusually rapid convalescence.
Little or no carnage — even in videos whose title suggests otherwise.
Extremely lopsided coverage.
Contrary witnesses absent from MSM.
Failure to refer to suspect as alleged shooter.
Continued reliance on demonstrably untrustworthy witnesses.
Confiscation of cell phones or instructions to turn them off.
Shooter dead or court record to be concealed.
Closed casket funerals.
Happens during or shortly after an active shooter drill.
AR-15 or other assault rifle used.
Evidence of prior knowledge.
General amateurishness in production of school play, as feds call it.
Embarrassingly bad crisis actors, with implausible or over-the-top witness accounts.
Highfallutin’ hogwash oratory.
Crying without tears or absence of bereavement.
Inappropriate laughter by witnesses, analysts, authorities, or perps.
Over-the-top suspect history — especially social media posts.
What would a rigorous inquiry into the facts of the Parkland Florida incident look like?
You have to look at evidence, starting with the most certain.
Of various types of multi-media, the most certain (hardest to falsify) is video.
Witnesses are usually not reliable -= with exceptions.
What is known without any question is that David Hogg interviewed a shooting survivor on video at 9:32 am, which he announced on the video in his own voice. This is 5 hours before the shooting started.
There are other videos of him making mutually contradictory statements.
This is probably sufficient to overthrow the official narrative.
But add to this the absence of this information from MSM, which is HUGE.
Also, the public has shown little interest in this video. That's even bigger.
The irony is that everyone acts like they care about what happened, but maybe one person in a million openly acknowledges incontrovertible proof that the official narrative is blatantly false at its foundations. This irony usually signifies FEAR -- which under the circumstances, is understandable.
Four images of Cruz being arrested,
in approximately chronological order,
show his person bearing variously
o Deep blue fabric,
o Light blue fabric,
o No blue fabric.
IMAGE 1 — Frame from video of Cruz’ arrest -- apparently unconscious.
No visible blue apparel.
IMAGE 2 — Still of Cruz’ arrest.
Deep blue shorts plainly visible.
IMAGE 3 — Handcuffed Cruz, escorted by police.
No visible blue apparel.
IMAGE 4 — Handcuffed Cruz, surrounded by police.
Light blue fabric visible around waist.
IMAGES 1 & 2 show Cruz lying on the ground, being arrested.
IMAGE 1 is from a video where he appears
to be UNCONSCIOUS, with no visible blue fabric.
IMAGE 2 shows him fully CONSCIOUS,
with plainly visible blue shorts.
IMAGE 2 appears contrived.
Cruz is looking into the camera,
possibly wearing makeup.
His pants are worn low on his waist, revealing
deep blue shorts, pulled way up.
Color of fabric appears to have changed
from IMAGE 2 (deep blue)
to IMAGE 4 (light blue).
Superteen Kyle Laman returns to school as deep ankle wound continues healing. It seems his toenails have grown back. And ethnic diversity in the Parkland school is symbolized by his multicolored foot !!
Kyle Laman — shot in the ankle at Parkland mass shooting — is healing remarkably fast, despite a continuing issue of HAVING NO TOENAILS.
This Superteen ran down THREE FLIGHTS of stairs with half his ankle blown off by a blast from an AR-15, the military assault rifle with muzzle velocity a dizzying Mach 4.
His toenails appear to be lagging behind his otherwise admirable convalescence, and we are searching for a plausible medical explanation for this bizarre phenomenon. Did the AR-15 blast selectively remove his toenails, too?
Stay tuned as the drama unfolds !!
Nikolas Cruz “Confession” in Sealed Documents
Dark comedy unfolds
Mentally ill, confused, and no doubt very frightened, accused Parkland gunman appears in court with attorneys, judge, court personnel. Not long ago, this young man was cutting both his arms on Snapchat.
His confession to the horrible carnage leaving seventeen dead was obtained by police. Great job !! (Same ones responsible for the convenient stand down as murder raged in building twelve?)
Videotapes show several minutes of proceedings, in two court appearances — notably absent from which is Cruz himself weighing in on the pivotal question: Did he do it? One can find neither confession nor denial. Nowhere to be found is evidence that anybody even asked him.
The Court has also agreed, on request of “defense attorneys,” to keep current and future proceedings sealed. Whatever happened to confession in open court? Was Cruz told that if he contests the charges, he may be executed? I’d call it over-due process.
Could it be that, before the shooting, arrangements were made between the law and his mother that he needs inpatient care, and court order is the only way to get him there? Coincidentally, his brother — accused trespasser, rather than shooter (six of one, half dozen of the other), has already been confined to a psychiatric facility. (Steven Wright: I went to court for a parking ticket. I pleaded insanity.)
Mr. Cruz stands in a long and proud tradition of mentally ill gunmen, accomplices, patsies — including Lee Harvey Oswald, Mark Chapman, John Hinckley — all linked to officialdom that had possible roles in the "shootings," successful or otherwise. As Joan Rivers would say, oh grow up.
During the school evacuation, classmate Alexa Miednik joked with the troubled Nikolas, "I'm surprised it wasn't you," -- explaining later to a reporter, "he just gave me a 'Huh?'"
His puppy-like demeanor suggests a similar view of the court proceedings. That “Huh?” may be the closest thing to a confession he ever made. We may never know, given the hermetic secrecy in which these “proceedings” are held. And given no apparent inclination to include several second-gunman witnesses in the defense.
Then again, since videotape of the carnage is not released, funerals are closed casket, the building is slated for demolition, and second gunman witnesses are absent from mainstream media, then court documents should be sealed, too.
Why spoil a perfect crime?
Only twenty minutes after the tragic shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School,
Gun control advocates were already advancing their agenda
in the media and Florida State Legislature.
Speaking through those too young and traumatized to see how they were being used,
they shamelessly tried to leverage a horrible tragedy to advance a controversial agenda.
Exploiting human tragedy for political gain is reprehensible.
So Give Generously to the NRA
Now more than ever
[This is satire, btw, but hopefully it will piss someone off.]
“When the veil come off, it takes your breath away for several days,
or at least it did for me. I now see the world as it truly is.
There is a huge grip on America.”
This is beautiful poetry from an unseasoned writer, at best. A visceral connection to his topic inspires language of unusual eloquence.
The author is describing coming to terms with staged events and their reality throughout mainstream media. He describes freedom, release, and just being okay with a world beyond one’s control.
He describes a level of awareness that is just easier — much easier — than efforts to maintain a veil of deception. It’s like all denial — about a relationship, health issue, or profession. It’s hard to see clearly from inside. But the burden needlessly born is recognizable after lifting the veil.
Awakening and acceptance are gifts. Their value can only be experienced.
Possible Russian meddling in US elections is vastly outweighed by known Israeli influence — or maybe control is a better word — in US governance. Dual citizens sit at the state’s highest echelons — some accused (though not charged) of high treason for subordinating American interests.
Israeli Prime Ministers have gone on record boasting of this control over the United States — a mass of humanity that is easily manipulated. Case in point? How about the disproportionate emphasis on Russian influence?
Folks, this really isn’t complicated. Will anyone wake up and acknowledge reality besides a few fringe conspiracy theorists? If you don’t understand all this, for god’s sake find out. The United States is at a juncture it’s never seen before, and nobody knows where it's leading. Guns have risen to the top of the list of issues.
However unlikely, ruminations of civil war have assumed a previously unknown tone of urgency. And that is largely because communication has broken down; there’s no longer any possibility of talking in a frank, civil, and honest way. The personal attacks have supplanted constructive discourse.
These attacks are spear-headed by a media that dismisses as bullies those with enough common sense to question the official accounts of “mass shootings,” citing the well established phenomenon of crisis actors.
And this all goes right back to the same issue of who is controlling the American media, influencing the public dialogue on gun rights and the internal workings of the US government. And gullible pawns are only too happy to do their bidding, faithfully attacking RussiaGate while ignoring the vastly greater and longer-standing issue of control over America from Israel.
The evidence has been laid bare as can be, with myriad published interviews of “survivors” attesting it was a fucking drill, as they witnessed and were informed before the fact by school officials and law enforcement.
The stand down of no fewer than nineteen cops should be a dead give away to anyone with a clue about 9-11. What is it about a stand down facilitating a false flag hoax that you don’t get?
This is not about evidence. It’s about mental blockage. Intelligence, education, erudition, and good intentions are no defense against this subtle but nefarious villain in the heart of all refusing to believe what should be in front of their eyes.
To admit the truth about Parkland, you’d have to admit you’ve been hoodwinked your entire life by those in media and government who just don’t give a shit about you or anyone you know. But it’s part of a painful process -- so deal with it. First the Tooth Fairy, then Santa Clause, then a beneficent media and government who give two craps about you.
The media’s been lying to you your whole life. If you would turn off the spigots of bullshit poisoning your brain since time immemorial and try -- just try -- getting information from alternative sources you’re not accustomed to, whose reliability you’re uncertain of, and that make you uncomfortable, angry, confused, or even frightened -- you will begin to get a clearer picture of this world and how it really works.
It takes time -- to lose the addiction to the media’s bullshit and acclimate to novel sources. It takes time to sort out who is telling the truth from who isn’t. It takes time to realize there is no be-all-end-all source of information. The only clear picture to be gleaned involves myriad sources that collectively enable the thoughtful, patient viewer/reader to piece together their own accurate picture.
And it doesn’t resemble what you’re currently used to -- even slightly. As it grows clearer week by week, you will see the difference -- with possible tinges of embarrassment at your former gullibility. But there will be no question that your more broadly informed view makes much more sense. And let me repeat one word from the foregoing: fear. When you finally figure out what the fuck is going on, you will be frightened. This is not Alice in Wonderland.
Maybe the issue is evidence. People seem to think that interviews with ostensible witnesses and tear-laden testimony from the supposedly bereaved constitutes evidence. It doesn’t. It constitutes bullshit, and you should know better. Evidence is stuff you don’t really wanna talk about, like corpses, autopsies, blood -- rivers and rivers of blood -- insurance claims, police investigations. If there were an actual investigation by someone with subpoena power who must decide whether there’s a case that holds water, this incident would be laughed out of court.
If the tone of this oevre seems testy, strident, or downright excoriating, try to understand from the viewpoint of one who’s fed up with insulting rebukes for having taken the time to learn what really happened at Parkland High.
I am sick of seeing the likes of gullible fools and those lying through their teeth dominating the airwaves, internet, and printed media. The purveyors of your daily delusion have ensured that you don’t see the stories, videos, and other information that make the reality of Parkland abundantly clear. You don’t even know what they're censoring, as the loyal viewer/reader that you are. Make it your business to find out what’s being concealed from you, and join the ranks of a civilization where truth actually matters.
Perhaps you’re also unaware of the stockpiling of arms and ammunition by groups around the country who are one step ahead of me -- they’ve given up on permeating your reinforced cranial armor, and they’re preparing for the only alternative to dialogue this world offers. Get over yourself, your feelings, your sympathies, your biases, your agendas, your fuzzy-minded gullibility, and everything else that issues from your solipsistic, fantasy-manufacturing machinery and deal with reality as it is.
There was no shooting at Parkland High. There were crisis actors galore. The government and the media are lying through their teeth as they’ve been doing for years. The police stand down was not the result of cowardice or miscommunication but of an intentional effort to make a pre-planned drill appear as a real shooting.
And deal with the consequences of your own stubbornness. When you make an evidence-based dialogue impossible with your high-minded, condescending, bombastic dismissals, you don’t leave those who have no problem with real fucking life with many options.
Oh, by the way, thanks for reading. Please like, subscribe, and enjoy the virtual watusi.
And don’t take the foregoing to heart. I was only kiddinggggg .. really.
Many thanks to Barry Manilow for divine inspiration from his enduring lyrical masterpieces.
In a flight of righteous outrage, I posted the following last night on Facebook. I hope that Providence will forgive my prideful outburst.
A Reddit Post* makes an earnest plea for hard, incontrovertible evidence of an actual shooting at Parkland High School, where people actually died.
How many times has the government lied to us? How many times have we been deceived by the media?
How many times did Lucy fool Charlie Brown with the football trick?
It's not that difficult to provide hard evidence -- if it exists. DEAD BODIES are perhaps the most salient example of hard evidence that mass fatalities have occurred.
Would people really rather be hoodwinked by those who'd like to push their agenda through trickery than to admit that the absence of DEAD BODIES is a significant deficit in the prevailing, mainstream account of the Parkland incident?
I would rather belabor the unpleasant issue of DEAD BODIES than allow what may well be just another mass deception to go unchecked.
Please, lose your tact, etiquette, politeness, and sensitivity and demand to see DEAD BODIES before proceeding with this risible farce any further.
* Sorry, I can't find the link now.
I just signed a petition with the above-referenced title -- on a website with petitions for everything, started by peeps like us, as well as by peeps unlike us.
Here is my comment on Youtube censorship ..
People with unpopular views that challenge mainstream media's depiction of events are effectively bumped from Youtube -- or prevented from earning.
READ MORE AT ..
(One day I'll learn how to post a link the right way.)
Sign lots of petitions to get your voice heard over the din of corporate media .. or start one of your own !!
Motion can be recognized as backward only relative to a previous (presumably forward) direction of motion. However, the comparison must be made between the present direction and the memory of the previous direction. Because memory is necessarily of the past, time must be moving forward to compare this memory with one's present direction. That's why you can move backward in space (and realize it), but not in time.
The impossibility of backward time travel is a direct consequence of time's status as an identity function of itself. There may be no more gratuitously self-evident statement than one second from now the time will be one second from now. To disagree with this is not merely a violation of physics but of language, logic, and perhaps any foundational epistemic platform.
And yet violating this tautology is required to go back in time. If I have a time machine, and T0 = T0 (now is now), then a second later (at time T1) I press a button that takes me back by 2 seconds (to T-1), then we obtain the enlightening curiosity T1 = T-1. Remember, this is not a statement that some measurable parameter will have the same value at T1 that it had at T-1, but rather that T1 and T-1 are the same point in time — though defined as distinct points, separated by two seconds.
So why the perpetual hullabaloo about time travel from scientists and philosophers? They must be living in another century.
'If they called it science fiction, I wouldn’t mind. When people want another fix for their stim-seeking minds, sensationalist journalism gets the job done. Sensationalism is not confined to daily or weekly tabloids. It’s abundant in the so-called science issuing from myriad sources - from cinema to symposia.
Whether we are living in a computer simulation is a metaphysical question, not a scientific one. No empirical evidence can possibly be used either to defend or refute this popular idea, introduced into the public imagination by The Matrix. (This movie’s depiction of self-defense — with arms extended above the head — would fly about as well in the UFC as its metaphysics does in the present review.)
This question hinges on arbitrary, subjective, and conscious judgements. At root, all information is subjective. A vertical stroke of ink represents the number one because I say so & so do most others I know.
Now let's say this 1 is fed into a computer, which spits out the numeral 2 after running an app called DubbleIt. This app has changed the data from 1 to 2 — a change that might be interpreted as doubling. This interpretation is subjective, arbitrary, and conscious — just like the data itself.
Key point — if the data is subjectively interpreted, then so must be the program that changes the data.
Moreover, I might regard this mathematical doubling as representing a physical process — such as a population of one, lonely amoeba, who subdivides to render two amoeba. Such an interpretation renders the example a simulation — also subjectively determined.
So are we living in a simulation – relative to some one’s interpretation? How about relative to my own? The answer involves a subjective, conscious judgement. So can anyone else’s conscious judgement override my own regarding my ontological status?
This is starting to get confusing, so I’ll conclude that I choose to interpret my own physical being as real, not a simulation of itself. (Not that it would matter. I doubt “simulation-hood” would qualify as a criminal defense (“But Your Honor, … ”).)
Whether my physical being could in principle be considered a computer is yet another question, which I’m sure somebody, somewhere has answered. This is what I get for trying to write on a popular topic. They key to clarity on abstract, existential questions is asking the right questions. You don't usually find them in the popular media.
BTW, try my eBook, “How Popular Media Preys on Public Gullibility for Shameless Self-interest,” only $99.95 !!
The fourteenth amendment made the bill of rights binding on the states. Ironically, the bill of rights had been passed by the states to curtail the power of the federal government. Something is wrong here.
It was inevitable that the federal government would exceed its constitutional mandate. That's why a schizophrenic constitution was ratified listing federal government's powers in the body and powers it doesn't have in the amendments. It's like a menu that lists dishes served by a restaurant on one side and dishes it doesn't serve on the other.
Thanks to the federal government's arrogant power grabs, we've had unending wars for the better part of a century, with millions of people killed -- among Americans and others -- and trillions of dollars spent -- with no end in sight.
The fourteenth amendment is exploitation disguised as empowerment. But for the second amendment, the federal government would have completed this enslavement long ago.
Yowza x 3.
Schindler's List (1993) and Denial (2016) are classic films in the holocaust genre that share one salient feature. Neither was overly concerned with truth, despite gut-wrenching sanctimony. What is it with people ostensibly concerned with injustice -- utterly and abjectly unconcerned with truth? I'll never understand this.
Denial depicts the libel trial where author David Irving sues Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher, Penguin Books. Irving claimed defendants improperly depicted him as a Hitler fanatic and antisemite. Probably the film's most obvious distortion is having Lipstadt's role played by an attractive actress (Rachel Weisz).
No mention is made of the publishing deals Penguin struck with defense witnesses, one of whom lied under oath about it. Also unmentioned was the quarter million dollars paid for an expert's testimony. The judge called this fee obscene, despite ruling in Lipstadt's favor.
Would my testimony be influenced by a quarter million bucks? My loyalties are available for way less than that. Contact selloutBonanza@spinelessFuck.com. Ironically, some of the money for Lipstadt's extravagant defense came from none other than the esteemed director of Schindler's List.
In a preliminary screening for Spielberg's holocaust classic, a camp survivor recounts her experience. As she describes witnessing 5 people being killed, she extends her open palm to show 5 fingers. The problem is in the final cut, where she says 100 people were killed -- but she still opens her palm to show 5 fingers !!
Her words matched her gesture in the screening but not in the final footage. Had she been coached? What do you think? Why can't professionals like Spielberg cover their tracks better than that?
In time all distortions will be laid bare, but the fees, judgements, and royalties obtained fraudulently will never be returned. Justice will prevail when people acknowledge the truth by acknowledging the lies -- closing the curtains on the Hollycaust.
I’m watching a rambunctious debate about evolution. (Has there ever been a nonrambunctious one?)
The issues seem so intricate as to require years of study to develop an informed opinion. How we got here is an interesting question, but not one of significant practical ramifications. So why all the hot air?
I’m not even sure what the question is. I know one hypothesis is that species are descended from one another, for which the fossil record ostensibly provides supporting evidence.
There’s also the question of how the ball got rolling -- what’s the first organism? The first replicator, a DNA molecule, has been described as a miracle of the first order by mathematician John von Neumann.
The most contentious question may be how organisms adapt to their environment for better chances at survival. The traditional genetic models have been seriously challenged by mathematical arguments.
An enhancement of purely genetic models has been discovered in epigenetics. In this model, parents develop traits during their lifetime to pass on to offspring -- similar to Lamarkism.
This theory gained traction in the 1990’s, yet I only heard of it relatively recently. Shouldn’t one of the biggest biological discoveries since Darwin have been a major and widely disseminated news item?
Something’s wrong here, and I suspect it has to do with politics. You can’t neatly separate science from politics -- though it is sometimes tacitly assumed possible.
Science can never be totally separated from the scientists -- or the nonscientists, or the media, or the limitations of a natural language that didn’t evolve to convey abstract theoretical principles. More saliently, science cannot easily identify boundary topics impervious to its methods.
What we call science is par excellence a social, if not outright political, undertaking, subject to the foibles, biases, agendas, oversights, errors, accidents, preconceptions, miscommunications, uncertainties, hyperboles, and outright distortions that typify other spheres of human activity.
I’m not even sure what it means to be scientific. May I note, without committing, that a Don at Oxford University’s Philosophy Department has conceded that, after a search spanning a quarter century, he still doesn’t know what it means to be scientific.
I’m fortunate to have had a graduate advisor who spent his professional career on the question of life’s origin. His papers, which I’ve only recently begun to understand, are beautifully written and illuminating. Yet I’m uncertain of his views on evolution.
This is my point. The origin of life is a topic of enormous complexity and beauty. It can be the source of endless entertainment and even fulfillment -- but only by letting go of ideological considerations, which can sap the meaning and wonderment from one of the most fascinating questions of all.
Oh, one more thing: DIE CREATIONIST SCUM !!
[This post was already published, but not as the top post. It is re-posted here on top.]
Novel Assault Methods at Parkland High School3/7/2018
New close quarters combat techniques have produced some novel effects, as seen at the recent Parkland School shootings in Florida.
The technique, called the 1-2-kaBoom, is adapted from boxing for close range defense. First the left jab is thrown, then instead of following up with a right cross, the assailant aims his gun and opens fire from point blank range, usually producing immediate death.
In rare cases where the shooter's marksmanship is especially hideous, the gunshot misses the victim entirely, who nonetheless may have been hit squarely with the jab.
This precise scenario unfolded for Samantha Fuentes, Parkland shooting survivor, interviewed after receiving medical treatment. She sported a shiny black eye as a badge of bravery and battle-hardened timber -- and virtually inconceivable luck.
Providence was smiling brightly on the 18-year-old senior, as no visible swelling appeared on her face, despite having been hit by shrapnel, one piece lodged behind her eye.
The world rejoices that one of God's children has been spared the misfortune of an untimely death; and her loved ones, the pain of bereavement.
As she lay wounded, awaiting EMS, she was heard praying, "Fuck Trump & the NRA" -- a refrain repeated by all survivors of the unthinkable tragedy.
Stay tuned for developments in rapidly evolving combat modes, as the earth hurtles in a perilously accurate trajectory toward total destruction.
On BogusFocus --
All Bullshit, All The Time.
Even our trademark is Bogus[TM]
A crescendoing stream of fabricated news reports is taking an increasing toll around the world, as people make vain attempts to reconcile themselves to a world that does not exist. This virtual world, as psychologists call it, is created by an increasingly unprincipled media desperate to remain competitive among players as unscrupulous as themselves.
Though this trend has been noted for its effect on emotional health, gauged by hospitalizations and prescriptions, among other measures, it has recently taken a more serious turn. Though suicides have been known to occur among those struggling in vain with a delusional understanding of the world around them, the specter of mass suicide has only recently begun to haunt the populations of affected peoples around the world.
In Tehran, on August 18th of this year, deaths of 98 parties to a suicide pack jumped, one by one in rapid succession, into the Myrulon River, just north of Iran's capitol city, in reaction to what for them was apparently the last straw: a false news report featuring their own children, who had allegedly been molested by an athletic coach from local middle schools. Al Bin-Hassan had been leading competitively successful lacrosse teams in national leagues since the mid-90s, and was highly sought after -- a factor assumed to have played a part in suppressing rumored allegations.
When the suicide note was found, signed by all 98 parties, the child abuse allegations were immediately investigated, after which they were found to be wholly without foundation. Mr. Bin-Hassan humbly cooperated with authorities, until it was determined that he did not exist.
Similar tragedies have been reported in Mumbai, Vladivostok, Dublin, Timbuktu, and British Guyana -- yielding a staggering death toll of 417 since the beginning of the year. Reporters at BogusFocus[TM] are keeping close tabs on the situation. Stay tuned for more bullshit, as it happens.
All Bullshit -- All the Time
Even Our Trademark Is Bogus[TM]
Space is allowed multiple dimensions solely because time is not. Let's say you're moving in one spatial dimension (north) and being timed on one clock. Then you suddenly change directions by turning right. Now you are moving east — in a totally different spatial dimension — while being timed on the same clock and hence in the same time dimension.
This ensures that your motion in both spatial dimensions is in the same universe, since your time dimension hasn't changed. If, in changing spatial dimensions, you had also changed time dimensions, you would have stepped into a different universe.